LIFE ITSELF was an extraordinary movie for me. I admit that I went to see him worried. He knew that in the last few months of his life struck by cancer on this planet, he would represent the most famous film critic to date. He saw a picture of Roger Ebert, who had no lower jaw and had little internal support for his chin, lips, and gums. I didn’t know if a vicious invasion of a man’s personal pain somehow enriched his life and strengthened my gratitude. But he was wrong. He is completely wrong.
After a few sequences, after a few sequences, I began to understand his unwavering determination and insatiable enthusiasm for doing what he wanted to do: browse the movie and read everything he wrote. I blogged his comments to those who seem to be.
Without his lower jaw, Roger couldn’t speak. I couldn’t eat. I couldn’t drink. His food found power through feeding tubes. And to further threaten his sense of restlessness, he actually had to be inhaled for hygienic reasons. We had to see it all, and I think it’s repulsive, but only at that moment. There was no pain for a long time.
The firm words of her advocate, Chaz, emphasized her love for him and his love for her. Their unlikely marriage was built from their first encounter when they were in A.A. We learned early on that Roger Ebert drank so badly that he almost wanted to die. You decided to go to A.A. He not only quelled his drinking habits, but also led him on the path he began to look for Chaz. At the age of fifty, she fell in love with this love and is perfect for inner development and outer support. Visit:- https://themartinnews.com/
The fact that Chaz was black and white is rarely mentioned in LIFE HIMSELF. This surprised me. The only time it is spoken is when thinking about how Chaz actually felt to marry a white man, and how her own children and her grandchildren could accept it. is. Of course, Roger had a small family by that time. His parents were dead. And he was her only descendant. Chaz showed people that she was an extraordinary woman. And her color does not seem to deviate from the romance and her well-being that her friends felt when he married her. Watching him play as a stepfather and grandfather of his children is the beginning of seeing him become more balanced.
What we quickly learned when the film started was that Roger Ebert was not the best young writer. He had a personality with a careless ad along with an article about the murder of John F. Kennedy, as he did when he drowned a college newspaper publication. But shortly after joining the Chicago Sun-Times, when he was asked to write a weekly movie review, he wasn’t the most friendly and gentle writer there, but people did his job well. I see you doing it. He maintained his entire career at Sun-Times, 46 years of loyalty.
The film also features the famous verbal battles that fought on television in front of the audience for 24 years, until Evert and Gene Siskel died early in the 19s. His antipathy was not hypocritical. We learn that they really envy each other for all sorts of things outside the film. When they went to Johnny Carson or Letterman (who was doing because they were still in the news), they tossed a coin and decided who would come out first and who would sit next to their host. Did. But their verbal controversy over the benefits of cinema that one of them might approve was that viewers learned about cinema in a way that film critics had never done before.
Ebert was married for 10 years when Siskel died. A few years later, Evert was diagnosed with laryngeal cancer, a type of cancer that often occurs as a result of drinking or smoking, but if it is known, what is the cause of this movie? Is not mentioned either.
What the illness and its consequences did to Evert was to change him from a man who lived in the palm of his hand to a man who had to dive deep into his existence and stand up with his love secret. bottom. Looking at him without a mouth and chin, he looks like a man with an eternal smile. I felt that this relentless adversity gave him a tendency far from when happiness smiled most.
When I left the theater, I thought of Roger and wondered: if someone tried to write the story of a man like Roger … and they wanted to move forward-his By mouth-did you want to stop him with a curse? Because he always continued … (and from this strange hardship, he developed his presence into something that people sympathize with for his greatness … ): Isn’t it a story of human salvation?